General Directorate for Combating Economic Crimes (GUBEP) completed an inspection of the company's "growth-Lada" that traded vehicles under the brand's largest showroom in the capital "Rostokino Lada." The audit was conducted on the treatment of Muscovite Svetlana Andreeva. She tried to return Salon substandard "Chevy Niva," but the company "Growth-Lada" refused to take the car even on the court, and then completely vanished: the accounts zeroed, and the employees transferred to the company "Rostokino-Lada". GUBEP not found in the actions of General Manager of criminal offenses. The novelty of the season - an experimental model "Chevrolet Niva" (WHA-21 230) Svetlana Andreeva acquired in April 2001, in showroom "Rostokino-Lada" in the street Wilhelm Pieck. Muscovite happy Purchase cost of 313 thousand rubles. Soon, however, the joy of owning a rare car at the time has dimmed. - A week after the purchases began to fall off interior paneling - told "Izvestia" Svetlana Andreeva. - Then the problems started with the suspension - fell apart ball joints and tie rods, door handles fell off and the gearbox Oil began to flow. repairs are under warranty, but in January 2002, after the third one failure of the generator, I decided to return the car to the dealership - it was stipulated in the contract of purchase. But alas. Return the money for substandard car in the showroom Andreeva refused. Avtovladelitsa not lost and appealed to the Moscow Society of Consumer Protection (MOZP). However, the appeal of this organization, "Rostokino-Lada" also did not respond. In March 2002, on behalf of the lawyer MOZP Andreeva filed by the seller - LLC "Growth-Lada" (this is the company was listed in sales contract) to the court. The plaintiff demanded her pay the cost of poor-quality car and pay a penalty totaling 1,915,872 rubles. In May 2003, the capital of the Meshchansky District Court granted the petition and made a determination Andreeva for seizure of money and property company " Growth-Lada "in the amount of the claim. In order to bring a court in execution on June 1 auto show" Lada Rostokino "came the bailiff. However, staff Ltd." Growth-Lada ", citing a lack of general director, accountant and lawyer, refused not only submit documents to the inventory of the property, but generally speaking with the officer. When you visit the bailiff, and a representative plaintiff MOZPa surprised to find that the show "Lada Rostokino" posted on the wall gave way to details of the company. It turned out that it is now under the same brand Ltd. does not work, "Growth-Lada" and OOO "Rostokino Lada." Employees same office - the same ones that were here before, stated that "Growth-Lada" is no longer there and never will. bailiff was presented sublease agreement, under which "The growth-Lada" leased from "Rostokino-Lada" placed under the office of motor vehicles for a total area of ??40 square meters for 3000 per month. The term of this contract expired April 30, 2003. For further checking revealed that the "growth-Lada" there is not a property or funds in the accounts - the company is actually on the verge of bankruptcy. It was logical to assume that this entity was initially firm, "padding", designed to take over all debts to the budget and to sink into fly on the eve of the date of reporting to the tax office. Soon, however, this version is no longer - with the tax inspection company has not yet conflicted, and, according to the Moscow Registration Chamber, she even had the real founders - Oleg and Sergei Isayev, Trubnikov, the latter is also the Director of company. It is remarkable that they are also the founders and the JSC "Rostokino-Lada", and as director has already Trubnikov. In a conversation with the correspondent of "Izvestia", he said he did not remember whether the founder of the company "Growth-Lada." However, in During further discussion Trubnikov has admitted that his partner Isaev, "after the events moved to Ryazan ', and the company itself has not yet been eliminated. - Yes, this company has really worked at a motor show in the street Wilhelm Pieck under the brand" Rostokino-Lada "- told "Izvestia" Director "Rostokino-Lada" Oleg Trubnikov. - I'm tired of people on this (apparently on the return of vehicles. - "News") want to discourage loot. people a year left, then find some reason - and in the "Lada" it can always be found - and returned to the car. We can not change the car a year after the sale. According to our rules on return of car is given 14 days. And people return - an average of three a week. And that car in general was the prototype - we did not know about. Parts on it not - we also did not know it. We were given five of these vehicles, plant on people just working out the production. And here we are? My position is - I do not agree with the law on the seller is obliged to a year to change the car, which he did not release. We have performed its obligations - car washed, had a presale. There is simple logic. Laws can recognize or not recognize on the basis of logical calculations. Realizing that they were simply "thrown" Svetlana Andreeva and lawyers MOZPa appealed to the police. Recently, Svetlana Andreeva received an answer signed by Deputy Chief Nicholas Malinova GUBEP MIA: "During the inspection of any criminal offense in the actions of the General Director of" growth-Lada "SS Isaeva not found. "- Reluctance of merchants to pay obviously, but nothing criminal, they did not commit - said the" News "to the press service GUBEPa. - It is entirely civil relations and issues of enforcement proceedings. GUBEPa Despite the decision, nor Svetlana Andreeva nor any of its attorneys do not give up and hope to appeal the denial in a criminal case. - In addition, we asked the police to the prosecutor and even filed a complaint with the illegal use of MAP Ltd. "Growth-Lada" brand "Rostokino-Lada" - said "News" Press Secretary MOZPa Tatiana Ivanchenko. - now expect to solve them.
No comments:
Post a Comment